Skip to content
← HCS syllabus
HCS (Haryana)Stage 2: Main Written Examination

Separation of Powers, Dispute Redressal and Comparative Constitutions

What the official syllabus says

HCS Main Written Examination, Paper IV: General Studies-II:

  • Separation of powers between various organs dispute redressal mechanisms and institutions.
  • Comparison of the Indian constitutional scheme with that of other countries.

Topics in detail

Separation of powers

  • The doctrine (Montesquieu) and the Indian version: functional separation with checks and balances
  • Article 50: separation of the judiciary from the executive in public services
  • Ram Jawaya Kapur v. State of Punjab (1955): no rigid separation in India
  • Legislative checks: questions, motions, committees, impeachment, budget control
  • Executive checks: appointments of judges, ordinances, pardoning power (Articles 72 and 161)
  • Judicial checks: judicial review (Articles 13, 32 and 226), review of constitutional amendments
  • Mutual restraints: Articles 121 and 211 (no discussion of judges' conduct), 122 and 212 (courts not to inquire into House proceedings)
  • Judicial activism, judicial overreach and judicial restraint; public interest litigation
  • Delegated legislation and its control

Dispute redressal mechanisms and institutions

  • Supreme Court's original jurisdiction in Centre–State and inter-State disputes (Article 131)
  • Inter-State river water disputes: Article 262 and the Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956
  • Tribunals under Articles 323A and 323B (42nd Amendment); Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985; Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021
  • Alternative dispute resolution: arbitration (Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996), mediation (Mediation Act, 2023), conciliation
  • Lok Adalats and legal aid under the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987; Article 39A
  • Gram Nyayalayas Act, 2008; Commercial Courts Act, 2015; consumer commissions under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019
  • Ombudsman bodies: Lokpal and Lokayuktas; banking and insurance ombudsmen
  • Pendency of cases and judicial reform

Comparison with other countries

  • United Kingdom: unwritten constitution, parliamentary sovereignty, constitutional conventions, fused executive
  • United States: presidential system, strict separation of powers, “due process of law”, judicial review, rigid amendment procedure, dual citizenship of State and federation
  • “Procedure established by law” (Article 21) and the effect of Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978)
  • Canada and Australia: federations with residuary powers placed differently; Australia's Concurrent List
  • France: semi-presidential system; Germany: constructive vote of no confidence, Federal Constitutional Court
  • Switzerland: direct democracy, referendum and plural executive
  • Japan: constitutional monarchy with a parliamentary system; renunciation of war (Article 9 of its constitution)
  • Comparing upper Houses: Rajya Sabha, House of Lords, US Senate
  • Comparing amendment procedures, emergency powers and the place of the head of state

Comparison at a glance

FeatureIndiaUnited KingdomUnited States
Form of governmentParliamentaryParliamentaryPresidential
ConstitutionWritten, partly rigidUnwrittenWritten, rigid
SupremacyConstitutionParliamentConstitution
Head of stateElected indirectlyHereditary monarchElected President, also head of government
Chat with us on WhatsApp